Disclaimer: Many of these articles express views that have been superseded and we no longer hold to be true. They are left on the website as a historical record of the development of Ryoute. Please read the FAQ for a more up-to-date version of our opinions. If there is anything not covered there please feel free to email us at info@ryoute.com
INTRODUCTION
Karate is facing a crisis. Well perhaps not a crisis but it is certainly
reaching a turning point. This is because of the rather unfortunate way
in which karate was set up. Gichin Funakoshi et al. could have had no
idea just how big karate was going to become when they first set up karate
as a Japanese Budo. As a result of their actions karate is now a worldwide
phenomenon. However, just because karate is popular does not mean that
it is perfect. There are a number of factors that contribute to the overall
popularity of karate and draw people into the art. Mostly they are the
superficial aspects of karate but once you have been practising karate
for a while you will realise that there are a number of inconsistencies
within the art itself. This presents the experienced karate ka with a
number of options. He1 can ignore these inconsistencies or take action
to resolve them. Assuming that he takes action to resolve them he then
has a further choice. He can adapt his mindset to try and accommodate
these inconsistencies or he can adapt his training thereby eliminating
the inconsistencies in his own personal environment. The adventurous karate
ka would even set out to change the face of karate itself to remove those
inconsistencies. In a sense this is what this article is.
WHAT INCONSISTENCIES?
The inconsistency I am discussing here is the one between karate kata
and effective combat techniques. There are two ways of approaching this
inconsistency. Firstly, if you are experienced in effective combat then
you will realise that karate kata are seriously lacking in useful content.
In fact the concept of kata itself has to be questioned. Is any kata despite
its design going to be useful in combat? Can you quantify the variables
of combat scenarios enough to be able to produce a useful kata? I URGE
YOU TO TRY IT! Answer this question yourself! Make up a kata designed
for combat, test it, use it and improve it. I will provide you with one
paragraphs worth of space to do this in…
If you haven't given up and you have actually designed a kata for combat
you must now ask yourself, "How well does my kata compare to traditional
karate kata?" Not very well I imagine. In any case, a large percentage
of you will find it more efficient in terms of combat training not to
bother with kata, ancient or modern. It's much better training to just
get 'stuck in' and get your 'hands dirty', and forget kata; especially
ancient kata. I said their were two ways of approaching this inconsistency.
The second way is to forget combat and look at kata. This is my preferred
option and how I have removed this inconsistency from my own training.
Kata must be for something, so what are they for? We already know that
they don't fit into combat, so they must be for something else. The question
is what?
WHAT ARE KATA FOR?
Once you get the formula right the function of kata becomes clear. One
of the elements of the Double Hand Grapping formula is that (in most cases) a fist represents
a grip. Also, (in most cases) an open palm technique indicates that your
hands are being gripped at the wrist. To illustrate this formula you can
try this simple technique from the Shorin Ryu version of Kusanku:
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6a
Figure 6b
Grab both of your training partners hands at the wrist in a cross hand
configuration as shown in figure 4, left over right hand. Perform the movements
demonstrated as solo in figure 2 and 3. The effect should be similar to
figure 5, 6a and 6b. This is a sequence with no obvious combat functionality
however it makes perfect sense when you look at it in terms of double
hand grappling. It definitely does something, it puts the person
being gripped in a rather awkward position. It would not work in a real
combat situation but since we have already ruled out the possibility that
kata are for combat then it doesn't matter. TRY THIS TECHNIQUE FOR YOURSELVES.
DO YOUR HOME WORK!
Take a movement from a kata, one that doesn't appear to have any obvious
application. Now try to apply the Double Hand Grapping formula. Go on! It won't take
you long to discover something, 5-10 minutes max. You don't have to be
a genius just get a friend and have a go.
THE POINT
The implication of this is that if the vast majority of movements from
kata can be understood in terms of double hand grappling. They
are obviously not for combat. If you don't believe me, just try and get
a double grip in a fight, you won't get very far. So what is the point
of doing Double Hand Grapping? Why did people invent grappling
techniques that couldn't be used in fighting? The answer is simple. Whoever
first thought of the idea of double hand grappling wanted physical competition
that did not turn into violence. They wanted to balance the competitive
urge of human beings with the equally strong urge to live peacefully.
They were creating a socially acceptable form of physical competition.
What I'm saying is that double hand grappling was a intricate part of
social dynamics of the society that invented it. There are thousands of
examples of wrestling-like activities being an essential part of ancient
culture. It's not just ancient culture either, in modern culture we have
sport! Sport is a way of competing without any violence being necessary.
Not only that, sport is also integrated highly into culture. Look at football,
we all cheer for the home side. It is as if the players represent our
nation or our city as they 'battle' on the pitch. Double Hand Grapping expresses something
innate about human nature, it lifts the spirit of the players and the
people watching and kata express Double Hand Grapping and give it it's structure and
are as much about performance as they are about practise.
THE CRISIS AND THE CONCLUSION
I said at the beginning of the article, karate is facing a crisis. I
said that karate ka had a choice. If you ignore the inconsistencies in
karate and hope that they go away, they won't. If you act to resolve the
inconsistencies by adapting your mindset then all you are doing is inventing
clever ways to cover up the inconsistencies. If you act to resolve the
inconsistencies by changing your training routine then you must choose
between kata or combat. It is up to you which path you take but try to
make an informed decision.